Press Release: Coalition for a Livable City
Urges Planning Commission to Reject Zoning Change for Cambrian Rise Development
From: Coalition for a Livable City
To: Burlington City Council; Mayor Miro Weinberger; Seven Days;
Vt. Digger; Burlington Free Press
Subject: Re-zoning of Cambrian Rise (aka former Burlington
College campus)
Burlington’s Planning Commission met on September 13th and
deferred action on rezoning the Cambrian Rise development from Medium
Density-Waterfront to Neighborhood Activity Center-Cambrian Rise (NAC-CR). What
was expected to be an easy approval of the zoning change proposed by Planning
and Zoning was de-railed by Commissioner Harris Roen. With only four
commissioners present--a bare quorum-- Roen’s vote was essential for passage.
When he spoke against the project, its developer, Eric Farrell, asked the
Commission to delay action lest its disapproval go on the record and be
transmitted to the City Council.
The project
components, on 33 acres of the former Burlington College property, arose
through discussions among the developer, the City’s Parks & Recreation,
Vermont Land Trust, Champlain Housing Trust, and Cathedral Square. Broadly, the
agreement has the City and the VLT buying 12 acres for use as recreational
space and a catchment for surface water runoff from the housing and permits 770
residential units, 160 of which will be
divided into senior and affordable residences under Inclusionary Zoning (IZ)
rules.
The public,
represented by Save Open Space-Burlington and now the Coalition for a Livable
City, was kept entirely out of these negotiations, merely presented with their
results at bogus “public forums”. While not opposed to development along North
Avenue, SOS-B strongly objected to this “package”, demanding much more open
space and wildlife habitat on the western section which, for 100 years, was a
vernacular public park exempt from all property taxes. The “park” portion,
largely unbuildable due to slope and waterfront setback rules, is isolated
between an abandoned train tunnel and Lakeview Cemetery. As such, it will
become the recreation space for Cambrian Rise’s 2,000 residents and, by
purchase agreement, the “sponge” for surface water runoff from CR’s streets, roofs, and parking lots. If
that deal weren’t bad enough, P&Z now proposes to rezone the plot as a
Neighborhood Activity Center (NAC-CR) allowing offices and retail activity that
further impacts traffic on North Ave. and to increase the permissible height of
buildings. Other NAC’s have a 35-ft. height limit. Here buildings could rise to
80-ft. or more given features specific to the location. First, the existing
Orphanage building establishes a 65-ft height for new construction on the same
plot. Second, present ordinances allow height on slopes to be calculated at the
midpoint of a building’s plot. With 65-ft established on the upper side,
P&Z proposes to simplify this calculation by adding an additional story of
permissible height wherever slopes exist, here and city-wide.
CLC strongly
objects to this proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Development Ordinance
(CDO)). Given the 10-ft. bonus a developer earns for complying with IZ, 65-ft
is really 75-ft and an 80-ft. limit is really 90-ft. Add to that the slope
bonus and from the west, buildings could rise 100-ft. from the ground. This is
wildly out of character for medium density-waterfront, an area more generally
zoned at 35-ft.
What we have at
Cambrian Rise is a duplicitous maneuver by P&Z to add height and density to
all new projects without acknowledging this to the public. Density or floor
area ratio (FAR) is based not on the 21 acres to be built on but on the 33
acres of the entire, pre-park parcel. Second, this “park” will be a
project-specific amenity on the City’s dime for maintenance, saving the
developer from having to provide recreational space, gardens, and storm water
mitigation within his development. Third, since nearly all of Burlington is on
sloped land, P&Z’s proposed amendment to the CDO would add a full story to
nearly all projects in the city.
The public
deserves transparency and appropriateness in zoning, respecting the broad array
of values which make a city livable: height and architectural preservation
respecting nearby structures, open space within projects, and environmental
protections. Thus we urge the Planning
Commission to reject NAC-CR as presently drafted.
No comments:
Post a Comment